Big corporation executives don't buy at Walmart

These are scary times: We already know there is no political leadership, but since there are plenty of people talking and doing something about that I need to say: there is also no enterprise leadership either.

Corporations keep finding ways to implement dump programs with the final goal of getting rid of people to "cut expenses", while at the same time do not invest on research and true innovation, except for a few exceptions. The real expense is on operational non-sense, politically correct policies, absurd executive and legal overhead, and luxurious parties. People don't seem to matter any more.

The already smarter than everybody else big shots don't listen to the employees who experience the day to day problems and deal with the customers and products. They don't even seek feedback. It is all about impressing one another with their

"initiatives" in their big boys executive club.

They've forgotten what truly makes a company, creates products, innovate, and maintains the corporate philosophy and spirit of the company - We the people. I don't have a problem with big executives and their salaries, heck great! Be successful. Gives me something to look fwd to. But I have a problem with the lack of common sense, and initiative. Everybody keeps doing the same thing just cause some other S&P company saved some temporary dollars by firing people or doing this or that thing that comes back to bankrupt the company at the end.

How do you justify saving $30M a year by firing good talent, while at the same time you give that CEO another $30M or more for doing a good work? That's why some big organizations will undoubtedly collapse. Because they had let go of the young blood and talent leaving the old out of touch big shots that think of nothing but the stock price. They only promote who they like (translated: Are like them, b.. kissers, and lower members of the same disconnected club). Then they stayed surprised and blame "The Market" when their dumb initiatives don't work.

They don't work because no-body with real life (Today's) experience is making decisions in the company or even listening to those who are dealing with the day to day. I mean listening without thinking on how that will affect the stock price. It is called "Investing" -> Doing the right thing because we and our customers will be better of at the end, not this quarter.

Living in the real world

==============

The other things is my subtitle - Executives don't buy at Walmart. I don't mean that every CEO has to go to Walmart, but what I do mean is that he has probably never even been to one or something similar. As long as executives keep meeting in country clubs, dinning at expensive restaurants to have "planning meetings", and traveling in expensive jets to go meet with their comrades executives they are not living in America, and things don't really need to change. We don't really have over 10% unemployment and for the most part things are really good. They don't really live in the real world. It is more like the Matrix and some even prefer it that way.

This had also have another effect in some long time employees, that don't even have the desire, intensiveness and dedication they had when they first started working with the company to do the right thing, and be really productive, which also includes speaking your mind. They rather sit down on their chair doing the minimum required while daily log into their retirement account to count the days. There is no real dedication, entrepreneurial spirit or pride, or mentoring of any kind. They moto is "I did my part, you figure it out". They've been left behind because their pension/retirement plans are too expensive to negotiate or cut them off from the company, and they know it.

The company is only waiting for that target date when they can be relieved from the legal pension/retirement obligation, cut more jobs here in the US and outsource and re-hire to China and India for pennies on the dollar. This is no reality, or trend, or cycle. This really is free market suicide fueled by the greed of very few.

If we continue this way we will be living in China but speaking English. The politicians, again don't care because they've been bought, promoted, and funded by the same greedy corporations and will refuse to make real changes or legislation that protect legal citizens in the workplace and will get rid of this layoff here and hire in India and China. They tax us and the corporations to dead and then philosophy about the job exportation problem, they look the other way and tell us that we don't understand.

There was a time when "Made in USA" meant "This is the best product of this kind available" period. Now you simply don't see it, and only experience it by the lack of. We need to send people like us to the congress and senate: Neighbors, teachers, friends, cops, workers, etc... People that understand the current problems and struggles, not somebody with a nice haircut and suit that says in a general way "I know we are hurting" - NO YOU DON'T. You've never experience it. We also need terms for those in congress and senate, just like the president does, so we can't stop dealing with the same dinosaurs who are so backwards that still believe Coke comes in a glass bottle. They have no clue! Some had done great things in their time, but have no understanding of the current struggles, and that's why terms are good!

If you bothered to read this, I hope you comment on it. I hope you advocate for change and innovation wherever you work, or even start your new company with true values that reward and promote people and people as an asset in the corporate culture. We are not commodity.

Finally to the big corporations: If there is no one working in America - no one will buy your junk!

What is the church?

What images spring to mind when you read the word church?

1. an angry preacher ranting about hellfire and damnation to an uptight congregation
2. a gathering of hypocrites
3. a boring place to which your parents dragged you as a kid
4. a group of people who believe they're right and all those other churches are wrong
5. the place where Fun goes to die

You can read the rest here: http://www.gospel.com/topics/church

It is a, good to meditate, short article.

-------
Numi's take: Is sad when we forget the essence of things. The church is not concrete, wood, and metal. The church is the people that get together in the name of Christ to learn and grow about His will for our lives. "Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I do my share on behalf of His body, which is the church, in filling up what is lacking in Christ's afflictions." (Col 1:24)

The magnificent, iconic, landmark structure is good for pictures, and might even attract people for a while, but like that brand new Mercedes, it wears off. It is conviction that keeps us people anchored and consistent, not iconic places.

So which one is the one in need of more attention and investment? the one with a mailing address and a big room we call sanctuary, or the people? Which one has probed to be more efficient when cared and invested on? What is the point in having a majestic building, if we have thirsty people which are spiritually limping, even though scripture has the miracle to restore and correct their "members". What is the point of churches of going into debt for something greater when there is already a sufficient place of gathering?

When I read the new testament I saw the apostles after Jesus died building churches, but no churches made of stone, but rather, of people. They meet in the catacombs during persecutions, and in private houses. The supper, was an actual pot-luck, and in that they remember Jesus gathering with their disciples. Paul emphasis was to preach the Gospel of Jesus crucified to pay for the sins of people, and teach them how to live their lives in a way that will seek God's glory. Perhaps the how to make a building for the church, book, was lost and still buried in the dead rolls pack too? ;-)

I am sad and tired to see people in the church with different problems in their lives which are already addressed in their bibles, to go to church and leave empty with just a couple of hymns, some cleric, and a bible read that they could have grab from their own bibles, this while the pulpit remains silent on those issues because the preachers, having been given the authority to give the practical application from the bible to the church's live (The People) are too afraid to get in people's case, or borderline in "legalistic".

Paul said to Timothy "Let no one look down on your youthfulness, but rather in speech, conduct, love, faith and purity, show yourself an example of those who believe." (1 Tim 4:12) - In other words, don't be intimidated by no one because you are young, but speak these things I tell you above with boldness and try to be an example (Now this is the past that is hard). And Paul did instructed some hard things for Timothy to teach.

So, if there is adultery in the church, preach about it. If there are marriage problems in the church, preach about it. If disobedient children, preach about it. Work related problems, or lack of, preach about it. If there are temptations in the church, preach about it. Respect for the authorities, alcohol, abuse, etc... preach about these things. (Some of you reading might be now thinking "Man! what type church this guy goes to?) ;-)

The point is: Minister, look at your church and see what needs it has, and provide for those needs.

I go to church because I am spiritually hungry. If I don't get the food I am going to leave more hungry, and is not supposed to be that way. Yes, not every body will have the same issues and needs, but the boldness of the pulpit will enrich us all when we build people, and put the attention on the things that really matter, not physical structures. I have witness this in my 5 year old, while paying attention to preachers when they are serious about letting the congregation know the will of God for their lives, and this on stuff that doesn't necessarily applies to his 5 year old life.

Long time ago I visited a church that for many years was "renting" their space of congregation. I have never forgotten that sermon. It was around election day and the preacher brought the topic of abortion (a hot one). He explained why because of his conviction about what the Bible speaks on abortion, and pointed to it, and why he didn't think it was OK to support a candidate or leader of any sort that will lead our nation that supported abortion, and why he thought it was relevant at that time to bring these things up. He didn't name names, but it was obvious then what/who he was referring about. He even went to say to the church (The people) that he wouldn't have any problem giving up the church's "exemption" status, if it will come to that and speaking the truth as he has been persuaded by scripture. NOW, that's what I call preaching!. He used his authority, given by GOD, not men, to clearly state the will of God. You may disagree with him, or not, but this man knew who he was and what authority he had to speak while standing there. And yet, he didn't speak his own word, because nothing is new under the sun (except the iPad, and even that is just a big iPhone!)

See, playing catch with members of the church during "counseling sessions" is OK. But the pulpit is a place where as a preacher you have the authority, not to single out people's problem, but to address a general issue for what it is, and give practical application on how God wants for you to deal with it.

So less care on the concrete and more on the people. If not you'll end up with a nice engrave of your name in a building that no one will visit.

2008 TX to WA Road Trip - Part I (The great adventure)

December 2008 was an interesting month for me. As a person that likes driving, I always wanted the opportunity to do a really long drive, and when October 2008 came along I found out I still had 13 working days of vacation left, and my wife kept reminding me about Christmas with her parents I saw that as the perfect chance.

The first decision was "Who?" was driving; Only me! "of course", since the idea of driving with my "Can't stand another half and hour on the car" wife, a non-stop talking four year old boy, a "Oh NO! I dropped my bunny!" meltdown crisis two year old daughter, and my high decibels screaming six months old baby boy, was pretty much a big NO NO. That's more like a prescription for personal suicide. Don't get me wrong, I love my family, but when you put all of us together in car for about 2k miles. The scene above was bound to repeat several times.

Anyhow, Erika was for sure flying, I decided to drive, meet her in WA and then drive back to Texas. But since she could only take two kids, I decided to take the non-stop talking four year old with me. I thought, "Well, at least he'll keep me awake!", and he did!

Since GC was going with me, we decided to take time and drive no more than 500 miles a day, leave early every day, and take time for him to stop, play, see some stuff, etc. So we planned a trip  of 3 nights and 4 days to get there.  The route there: Texas - New Mexico - Colorado - Utah - Idaho - Oregon - Washington

We prepared everything, got my AAA subscription, gather all the flash lights, tools, sleeping bags, blankets, snacks, etc... for the trip. I made hotel reservations on every destination city and carefully planned gas stops.

I was able to borrow a strap on DVD player from some friends. However, I decided I didn't want GC to watch too much TV, so I only let him watch 2 movies a day. The rest of the time was drawing, coloring, playing with Thomas the Train, talking about Thomas the Train (A lot!), and if I was lucky his nap time.

Day 1 - TX to NM (Dec 11, 2008)
Texas to New Mexico is pretty much... NADA to see. I hardly took 3 pictures during this time, of the same subject.  The most interesting thing found were the big giant electric wind generators. I am sure I could have found more interesting things to photograph but the fact is that when you're traveling with a four year old the priority is to get there, safe and soon so you don't have to drive during the night.

  
Wind generators closed to the Texas-NM border.

We made it to Clovis, NM early that afternoon, and it was perfect because right there on day one a rock hit my precious truck's windshield and made a crack. The insurance people were amazing, I called them and immediately they conference me with a local glass repair company that was minutes from our hotel, so GC and I took the truck there and they fixed it in 20 minutes. Great!, because I was going to need the defroster every day after that, and with cracks on the windshield it would have broken the glass completely. I am glad to say I had no more incidents after that. Best thing is, I didn't have to pay a penny. GC and I had pancakes that night for dinner, went back to the hotel and enjoy a swim in the hotel's warm pool.

Day 2 - NM to UT (Dec 12, 2008)
NM to Moab, Utah was a super nice drive. We crossed Colorado as you can see in the map, and the view was fantastic. I loved the whole Utah panoramic mountains. One of the most amazing things was the last 15 miles before arriving in Moab. It felt like we were going to hit the center of the earth. Going down at 6% incline for like 15 miles (No kidding) at about 75 miles/h hitting only the brakes watching for dears on the road (Dead or Alive). We finally got to the bed and breakfast at Moab and there was no-body there in the place. We were a little confused but figured out the doors were opened and that our room key was left with a note and instructions in the kitchen, so we unpacked and enjoy dinner in a local Moab restaurant.

 
View from our hotel window in Clovis, NM

GC ready to go to Utah.

Some where in Cuba, CO

 
Colorado

 
Colorado

 
I have a good story about this picture

 
Utah

GC playing in the bed and breakfast room

Day 3 - UT to ID (Dec 13, 2008)
The place we stayed at turned out to be fantastic, really good service and that morning we had an amazing gourmet breakfast. GC got to play with the owners dogs for a long time before we left and jumped around the rocks in their beautiful yard. By the time we left Moab and started getting close to Salt Lake the weather changed dramatically and we hit a snow storm - of which GC has no memory of because I kept him DVD plugged so I can concentrate on the road. His only comment was "Daddy everything is white!". It was my first time driving in snow, so as a smart "inexperienced" driver I decided to follow the guy in front of me with an older vehicle non 4WD that seamed to know what he was doing, and I didn't stop driving behind this SUV until I got to downtown Salt Lake City, where many of the local drivers didn't seam to have much more of a clue than I did about how to drive in snow.

Picture me, the Dominican guy who used to drive in the all-summer year weather of DR, now driving a rear wheel drive truck in snow annoyed at the lack of skills of Salt Lake City drivers. That, is an oxymoron!

Finally we left Salt Lake City and everything after there until Boise, ID was very good. I said "Great!, no more driving in snow". Ha! God does has a sense of humor. In that part of the country it gets dark around 5:00 pm, so in order to gain some time I am driving at 80m/h getting to Boise. My GPS said I had 20 more minutes before I arrived to our friends house and I was happy because it was already dark and I didn't want to keep driving at night. It was about 6:00 pm when out of the sudden I see everybody is on the right lane in a huge long line doing 20m/h and as a good Dominican, since I didn't see any traffic sign saying I needed to keep on the right lane - I simply kept driving. But I kept wondering why everybody is doing 20m/h on the right lane when there was no obvious sign of problem in the left? Perhaps is an Idaho thing I said. Speed limit said 75m/h so I kept going 80m/h when out of the sudden I figured out the why 20m on the right lane. My truck did a very tiny little sudden slide to the left and corrected itself and I saw smoke coming out of the road. I realized I was "Ice Skating" at 80m/h on a truck. I also kept seeing some cars on the sides of the road (not parked) that probably had the same experience I did.

At this point Idaho drivers on the right lane are wondering what the heck this "Texan son of a gun" (as written in the back of my truck) is doing?. My heart beat started to do 160 and I simply let go of the gas without even thinking about touching the brakes. Praise to God, there was NOTHING in the left lane and I got the truck to like 10m/h and from then on my famous GPS 20 minutes to destination became 2 hours. I was never so happy to arrive at a place, then when I arrived at my friends house in Boise that night, intact only by the grace of God. By the time we got to Idaho at our friends home I was so excited to have adult conversation that I forgot to take my cell from the car and Erika kept calling me thinking we had an accident.

GC playing at the B&B

 
B&B back yard

 

Right above the Moab city limits sign

 
About 40 miles north of Moab

 
GC playing in the snow

Day 4 - ID to WA (Dec 14, 2008)
This is day four and after a great BBQ snowed-in dinner, a good night sleep, and a fantastic breakfast GC and I were ready for the road, or were we? During the night, and that morning snowed even more in ID. Then I was warned by friends about the Blue Mountains stretch in OR and that I needed tire chains to be able to drive there "just in case" the snow was too bad. Now, Idaho people know how to drive in snow. They get snow all the time, so what for them is normal for me is like "Oh my gosh, chicken little, the sky is falling down!"

My friends told me "You'll be alright, we never needed chains unless it was really, really bad", so as a precaution I got a 5 minutes crash course in the passenger seat of a FWD Volvo of how to drive in snow, plus went to Wal-Mart to buy chains for my truck.

Leaving ID was no big deal. I took all I learned from those long 5 minutes in snow school and applied it... Plus I found some people with OR license plates at a gas station, I asked if they were going to OR (Obvious because the immense amount of junk up to their SUV roof), and if I could follow them? They said "of course" and I proceeded. At first during the snowed-in part of the roads these people were going really fast - but I had a lot of space and decided to follow them at a good distance. I figured, they had an older vehicle rear wheel drive, and they are doing alright. This would have been a somehow logical conclusion other than the fact the person driving that SUV was a kid no older than 18 years old. At that time, my now awaken senses told me it was better to take it easier, and I decided to let them go. Further than the road, way passed Boise where there was no snow this kid was doing 60m/h on a dry, clean, very well to drive 70m/h Hwy and my Dominican driving skills kicked in so I passed them at 80m/h.

Unfortunately that weather didn't last long. About 1 hour only to be precise. We hit the Blue Mountains and from then on it was a white nightmare. Lots of snow, but still I was reluctant to put on chains because I still wanted to get to WA during 2008 and with the tire chains is 30m/h maximum. Me being reluctant had to do with the large amount of old cars driving in snow, including an old Datsun pickup truck full of junk in the back that passed me in the mountains doing 70m/h. At that point the Dominican pride kicked in again and I said, heck, if these guys can do it without chains, I can too. Also to my surprise the Hwy signs only required chains for the big freight trucks 10k or more, so I kept going now following a lady in a Ford expedition FWD about 50m/h all the way to Portland.

By God's grace I made it through the lots of snow foggy roads in the mountains with no chains (Yeah!). After the Blue Mountains the snow in the roads was cleared and a new challenge arrived, ICE.

Man! that was horrible. I drove on ice for 4 long hours until we got to Portland. NOT COOL. Ice follows no rules, I saw lots of people crashed on the side of the road, but the fact that I had my little boy in the truck kept me focused and careful all this time, even when I was driving in the snow. During the last four hours before we got to WA we hit every combination of water, snow, fog, and ice in the road. You name it - we got it! Needless to say this day I took no pictures. I was too preoccupied with keeping the four wheels on the road.

We finally got home to my in laws house. It was nice to see the rest of my family, hug my wife and kids, thank God for getting us there in one piece, and relax... for 5 seconds before my wife told me we had a dinner that night at her sister's home and that we were late. Ha! I just drove 2,100 miles across the country and you're telling me I am late. You bet I am late! (Sorry Shaunna). And like any man that wears the pants in his home... I pleased my wife and went to the dinner ;-) (I was very hungry any way)

Of all the states I drove by, the ones I liked the most were Utah, Colorado, and some parts of New Mexico. I wish I had the time to take lots of pictures, but to me this was more like a driving, exploratory trip done for the simple sake of driving. I also learned to hate power lines and understand conservationist a little more. This is a gorgeous country, and I only saw a bit of it, but we keep ruining the view with this barbarian power lines. Outrageous!... OK, OK, I am starting to sound like a tree hugger.

I know most people don't find driving fun, but for me it is. I like driving, and now I know more places I'd like to visit with time and take some pictures. Perhaps take a vacation time with my family in the future. Also, I had a great time with my son. He reminded me of a couple of things about being the sweet kid he is that I had overlooked for the past months when I've been very busy at work. I discover some new things of his sense of humor, I learned the name of many of Thomas the train characters I didn't really wanted to ;-), and we had a great time. He is the reason I am writing this so I can look back at this when I am too busy or distracted again. He is the true King of the Road. For four days he sat in that truck watching a couple of movies, coloring, drawing, playing pretend with his daddy, enjoying the scenery without the "Are we there yet?", eating out, and playing with snow a few times. That time with him in the road is what made this whole adventure like Mastercard would say "Priceless".

Well, now I am going to bed and will tell you more about the trip in part II.

Quotes of real bozos

In light of the current economic bailout problem, that we are seeing in Wall Street due the bozos managed companies I decided to go ahead and look at what they say about themselves and their mission statements. Undoubtedly, I found bozos CEOs do have a sick sense of humor. These are still current quotes on these companies’ websites.

Washington Mutual
"You'll know it right away: We're not like other banks. We've always been about making things better for people—our customers, employees and neighbors." – Right!

Fannie Mae
“Fannie Mae has a federal charter and operates in America's secondary mortgage market to ensure that mortgage bankers and other lenders have enough funds to lend to home buyers at low rates. Our job is to help those who house America.” – Really? So, where are those funds?

Freddie Mac
“Freddie Mac's mission is to provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the housing market.” – Hahahahahahaha, sick, Freddie!

Lehman Brothers
“Our mission is to build unrivaled partnerships with and value for our clients, through the knowledge, creativity, and dedication of our people, leading to superior returns to our shareholders” – I wonder what they meant by shareholders? Their board of directors?

Merrill Lynch
“Merrill Lynch demonstrates its commitments to clients and shareholders through the firm's emphasis on excellence, integrity and ethical behavior.” – Until they don’t!

Wachovia
“Wachovia is committed to being the best, most trusted and admired financial services company. We carefully consider the impact of our business activities on shareholders, customers, communities, employees, and the environment. We leverage our social, economic, and human assets to deliver business results in a way that supports fair business practices and sustainability. Our Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Report highlights our social responsibility commitment and values in action.” – You can decide on this one!

Last but not least, the greatest, sickest joke of all

US Treasury – Mission statement
“Serve the American people and strengthen national security by managing the U.S. Government's finances effectively, promoting economic growth and stability, and ensuring the safety, soundness, and security of the U.S. and international financial systems.” – I wonder if Paulson ever read this. Anyhow, the biggest BOZO award goes to him.

More about equal distribution of wealth

I know these comments are not going to be well received by many, but I am not trying to talk anybody down. I admire and respect the fact that we might have different opinions.


Just recently I read an article about this topic and decided I just can not let it pass without a reply.


I do not believe in equal distribution of wealth because it not only has been historically proven not to work, but also, I believe that it is a grave mistake. I would like to clarify first that the idea of helping others (to me) is not only a matter of “doing something good" but rather a matter of obedience to God. God’s nature is the one of a giver, and He teaches us that as individuals created in His image we do well in giving to others who have less than we do.


That said, I also understand that we live in a corrupt world, fallen from the original design that God intended for us. The sinful nature of man makes it impossible for us to live in a perfectly “balanced” world. However, God also gives us guidelines to live by and behave within the different social layers of this imbalanced society.


The idea that government should take the role of balancing the wealth among individuals is not fair neither has it worked. It does not make any society better because of the nature of man. That does not mean that we are doomed, certainly there is hope and things we can do, but that hope is not government.


The role of government is not to take from those who have more so that it can be given to individuals who have less. Government is not to force social ideologies or religion in any way. The hypocrisy of equal distribution of wealth being controlled by the state (Marxism) is that a few men decide what is best for the rest of the nation and thus impose on the many an ideology. Now, how is that equal if not all of us believe it is right? If you have any doubts, look at the Soviet Union, communist China, Cuba, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, communist Vietnam, etc... All perfect examples of tolerance, freedom of speech, harmony, balanced economy, respect of privacy and religion, respect for human rights, and so forth... RIGHT?!


If something has been true about the examples above it is that government has spread equal damnation and poverty, not wealth leaving only a few in power who are controlling the nation’s wealth.


I think it is our duty as INDIVIDUALS to help others, donating our money and time to greater causes as much as we can, after one has taken care of his/her own family first. Private organizations and non-profit organizations historically have done a much better job reaching out in these ways than any government institution.


It is, however, perfectly fine for government to assist not only nations, but also individuals in times of great need (ie. In a time of natural calamity, etc.), which the U.S. has historically done better than others. I cannot say the same about our socialist European ”friends” for the most part.


We need the government to provide security, equal opportunity, and stability. We do not want it to babysit us, tell us what to wear, study, buy, or drive. Most especially, we do not want a government that decides when you have made enough money and now it is time to start taking it from you at an arbitrary rate (income redistribution). I am no rich person myself; in fact, I am far from it. However, if some of my friends become CEOs and make millions of dollars a year because of their effort and hard work, I will only applaud it and send them my resume ;-). Better, for them and those they can give jobs to. I hope that they become great givers then. That is the ultimate goal.


I didn’t always see things this way and it took me a while to detox my thinking, but it was clear to me after a few years in America, legally I might addJ, and saw the benefits of living in a country were hard work and determination can make the difference. Even with its flaws, this is a great place to live.


In conclusion, work hard and make a lot so you can give a lot. The role of government is to make it equally “possible” for every one, but not to dictate how is all going to happen. Otherwise, it becomes oppression.

About personal responsibility and equal distribution of wealth

This topic has been mentioned on and on lately these days in the news. But what exactly is personal responsibility? For what I have been able to read and see in the news lately, Barak Obama took some heat from some left wing movements for “daring” to suggest that Americans ought to have personal responsibility.

But what exactly is personal responsibility and why I think Barak doesn’t get it. Personal responsibility in the context of being able to live a decent life as a good American citizen is the understanding that you alone are accountable to both self and country to do whatever is in your hands, to morally, and righteously put your best effort to achieve your own goals, and abide by the law of the country. This means you are mainly responsible for taking care of yourself, not the government. That is truth regardless of where you live.

The problem with this is “Where do you live?”

Let me explain. If you live in a country where the manner your education is delivered, the choices for health care, how many children you can have, the type of fuel you put in your vehicle, and even the type of vehicle you can drive, how much money you can make before they decide you need to be taxed relatively much more than others, etc… then your personal responsibility is hindered. It might not mean much in some cases.

In that scenario I still have personal responsibility. The problem with it is that my best effort is always going to be truncated by a government decisions that overrule what I can achieve under the mantra of equality. …Right!

Equal possibility means that both you and I have the same chance at aiming for the same goal. But if at the end it turns out I exercised personal responsibility and aimed better than others, the outcome doesn’t make it unfair for any of the parties.

The role of the government is then to make things possible and fare for all Americans and law abiding citizens and residents, not only a few. The other side of it is that no citizen should be kept from achieving higher possibilities, and if we choose a president that will govern with the mindset of getting a much bigger cut from you because you make over $200k, he is not making it fare for you. Math tells me that if you make 200k and I make 50k and we both pay 25% of taxes, you are already paying into the economy more taxes than I do. 4 times more, to be exact.

One of the things I like about this country is that I am free to achieve, and I don’t want an American government to become what I know of other countries. I am free here to live where I want, go where I want, drive what I want, and buy what I want, given my possibilities because the government doesn’t hinder my ability to do those things, thus my personal responsibility and effort pays back.

That’s why Obama’s equal distribution of wealth is not really “equal” and it never will be. If he understood personal responsibility, he will know that. Punishing American companies for being successful is an error and it has socialism written all over it. What now? Do we need to take money from law abiding Americans that invested their moneys in Exxon just because Obama thinks it is too much money (windfall profits). That is the stupidest thing I heard. There is no mathematical or economic sense to that.